RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION

TEXAS RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION
THE INTENT OF THE HARASSER DOES NOT MATTER,REASONABLE VIEWPOINT OF THE VICTIM IS WHAT IS INTERPRETED BY COURTS.

DNA TEST AS A RELIGIOUS RIGHT IS CONSTITUTIONAL AS ANY OTHER RELIGIOUS PRACTICE

SURVEILLANCE VIOLATES MATHEW 6:6
ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE INCLUDES WIRETAPPING, ANNOYANCE, STALKING, HACKING, BRIBERY, AND FALSE OPPRESSION REPORTS OF CIVIL SERVANTS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT

FREE EXERCISE WITHOUT GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE AS WELL WITHOUT PERMISSION OF ANY OTHER RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION

OLMSTEAD V. U.S., 277 U.S. 438 (1928) constitutional right to be alone

U.S. V. KYLLO, 533U.S.27(2001)thermal imaging constitutes search

NAACP V. ALABAMA, 357 U.S.44(1958) freedom to association and privacy in association

NO STATE SHALL DEPRIVE ANY PERSON OF LIFE,LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.
Contrary to what the pursuit of happiness means slavery is over no one can force anyone else to work on a job. Every one has the right to work for anyone whom an agreement of employment can be obtained. No entity nor government agency can force a citizen to work for any one else.

UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT TO FORCE AND COERCE INTO PARTNERSHIP WITH RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS PICKED BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, THROUGH FRAUD, DECEPTION, AND THE USE OF GRANTS, BRIBERY, AND EXTORTION.

FEDERAL RECORDS, TAX RECORDS, POSITIONS OF REWARD FOR PARTICIPATION IN DOMESTIC TERRORISM

RELIGIOUS RIGHTS DENIED TO PROMOTE RACIAL PROFILING BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, LAW ENFORCEMENT, AND RELIGIOUS ENTITIES TO PREVENT AND OR DELAY AN AFRICAN AMERICAN HAVING A MINISTRY IN HUTTO, TEXAS. VICTIM SEEK RULE CV-65 INJUNCTION TO RESTRAIN FROM CONTACT BY THE DEFENDANTS AS DETERMINED BY WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS UNITED STATES COURT.