Conspiracy to defraud Texas

In the city of Austin, there exist a conspiracy by poverty pimps named Alan Graham and wife. It is to defraud the State of Texas and coerce blacks to pay bribery fees to live and practice religious freedoms in the city of Austin.

         V.T.C.A. Penal Code *7.02(b) conspiracy

Conspiracy exist where, with intent that felony be committed, one person agrees with another to engage in conduct constituting offense and one of them perform overt pursuant to the agreement.

Conspiratorial agreement maybe inferred from acts of parties.

person may be guilty as conspirator for offense committed by co conspirator, even though he does not aid in commission of offense. 

Conspiracy may be shown by events before, during, and after commission of offense which forms basis of conspiracy.

Exactly how many civil servants from The City of Austin and Travis County: promoted, encouraged, protected, and received kickbacks for their misuse of capacity, abuse of office and cover up of domestic terrorism. This is only one of the reasons why blacks have departed the City of Austin in larger numbers than the abortion rate which cover all other Texas major cities according to federal and state authorities. The adequate remedy of law is to revoke all tax credits, tax exemptions from the Grahams and all the entities which they control or sit on the boards of. I seek only a restraining order prohibiting contact by the Grahams, their partners, their associates, their lawyers and those who work in concert with.

EXCLUSIVE PRODUCT OF IN THE PIT MINISTRY PATRICK HAGGER FOUNDER COPYRIGHT 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

§ 15.02. CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY.  (a) A person commits
criminal conspiracy if, with intent that a felony be committed:
(1)  he agrees with one or more persons that they or one
or more of them engage in conduct that would constitute the offense; 
and
(2)  he or one or more of them performs an overt act in
pursuance of the agreement.
(b)  An agreement constituting a conspiracy may be inferred
from acts of the parties.
(c)  It is no defense to prosecution for criminal conspiracy
that:          
(1)  one or more of the coconspirators is not
criminally responsible for the object offense;
(2)  one or more of the coconspirators has been
acquitted, so long as two or more coconspirators have not been
acquitted;
(3)  one or more of the coconspirators has not been
prosecuted or convicted, has been convicted of a different offense,
or is immune from prosecution;
(4)  the actor belongs to a class of persons that by
definition of the object offense is legally incapable of committing
the object offense in an individual capacity;  or
(5)  the object offense was actually committed.                              
(d)  An offense under this section is one category lower than
the most serious felony that is the object of the conspiracy, and if
the most serious felony that is the object of the conspiracy is a
state jail felony, the offense is a Class A misdemeanor

n12 Liability
whether co-conspirators proceed severally or collectively each is responsible for the acts of all as though performed by himself alone.  BLAIN v. STATE (App1892) 18 SW 862
n13
Where several people are acting together in pursuit of an unlawful act, each is liable for unplanned and unintended collateral crimes committed by other principals if the crimes are foreseeable, ordinary, and probable consequences of preparation or execution of the unlawful act. THOMPSON v STATE (Cr. App 1974) 514  SW 2nd 275
n16
Indictment alleging in one count that defendant and another did unlawfully conspire to unlawfully take and steal money and property from City of Houston, that further conspired to take and steal money, funds, and checks from various unknown persons, and that they further conspired to accept bribes, alleged single conspiracy to commit a felony and under indictment it was not necessary that evidence establish that conspiracy entered into extended  to all of the intended offense was felony theft from unknown person, verdict of guilty was all that was required. NISBET v STATE (Cr. App 1959) 170 Tex Crim. 1  336 SW 2d 142





EXCLUSIVE PRODUCT OF IN THE PIT MINISTRY PATRICK HAGGER FOUNDER COPYRIGHT 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED